Kierkegaardian Ethics and the Rule of Law

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract We approach law with deep ambivalence. On the one hand, we take immense pride in living under rule of law. other often catch ourselves lamenting existence When lament law, are not just saying that there is too much it. complaining about amount Rather, our complaint goes to very nature itself. complain its rules constraining, generality ignores particularity each situation, coercive force rides roughshod over autonomy, and list on. However, notwithstanding frustration it want get rid This paper seeks express explain conflicting sentiments – why sometimes view as a monumental moral achievement so frustrated The answer, this will argue, lies norms. value limit traceable Kierkegaard helps us see that. argue ambivalence mirrors Kierkegaard’s ethics.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Manifestation of the Rule of “Who owns you?” and Position of Ethics in Civil Law

  Background: The rule "anyone who has the power over things" is one of the legal rules that the jurists of Islam have been referring to for more than a thousand years and it is very useful in trials and even administrative authorities. It is also one of the most important and practical rules in civil and jurisprudential law because it is closely related to confession, which is one of the main...

متن کامل

The rule of Mitigation of Damages in Medical Law and the Influence of Religious Beliefs in Applying this Rule (Comparative Study with American Law)

When one hurts or sustains a loss or damage due to harmful act, he or she shouldn't be motionless and after that, claim restitution but should act reasonably and do his or her best for blocking or decreasing of loss. The question is. Can this rule also apply to medical law? When patient hurts or subject to hurt because of physician's or other related persons' mistake, injured person should do a...

متن کامل

survey on the rule of the due & hindering relying on the sheikh ansaris ideas

قاعده مقتضی و مانع در متون فقهی کم و بیش مستند احکام قرار گرفته و مورد مناقشه فقهاء و اصولیین می باشد و مشهور معتقند مقتضی و مانع، قاعده نیست بلکه یکی از مسائل ذیل استصحاب است لذا نگارنده بر آن شد تا پیرامون این قاعده پژوهش جامعی انجام دهد. به عقیده ما مقتضی دارای حیثیت مستقلی است و هر گاه می گوییم مقتضی احراز شد یعنی با ماهیت مستقل خودش محرز گشته و قطعا اقتضاء خود را خواهد داشت مانند نکاح که ...

15 صفحه اول

When to Push the Envelope: Legal Ethics, the Rule of Law, and National Security Strategy

This Article argues for pushing the envelope when three conditions are met: (1) the executive engages in dialogue with other players, either before the fact or through timely ex post ratification; (2) pushing the envelope will generate a net positive aggregate of institutional consequences, viewed from an intermediate and long-term perspective; and (3) pushing the envelope harmonizes executive ...

متن کامل

Relationship between the Rule of Law, Good Governance, and Sustainable Development

This paper reviews the relationship between the rule of law, good governance, and sustainable development as those terms are used by the relevant development organizations; describes the efforts made by various organizations to promote the rule of law and good governance; and addresses the need to strengthen compliance and enforcement for sustainable development. A recent movement, which has re...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Law and Critique

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['1572-8617', '0957-8536']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-023-09347-4